All machines linked to their forum thread (full comment import)

1,289 discussions, 9,527 archived comments; pages no longer carry the comments themselves.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YDRjtmAiNpo5mK5N3d7QwZ

content/museum/atari-130-st-260-st.md

@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ params:
   - emulators
   - links
   - docs
+  forum_thread: 899
   photos:
   - title: ATARI 130 ST -VIEW#2
     subtitle: ''
@@ -295,19 +296,6 @@ params:
        source : [Daves Old Computers](http://www.classiccmp.org/dunfield)
 
       **... READ THE ONLINE VERSION BY CLICKING BELOW :**
-  comments:
-  - author: Anand S. (Netherlands)
-    date: Monday 5th April 2021
-    text: 'Not entirely true: only the 520 STF(M) models have a floppy drive built in. There were also 520 ST(+) models that had the same dimensions as the 260 (in fact, rebranded 260''''s) and therefore no built-in floppy drive.'
-  - author: Lars Vadjina (Germany)
-    date: Tuesday 19th November 2019
-    text: The 260 ST has no build in floppy disc drive. I should know as I was one of the first buyers/owners back in the days. Still own that wonderful machine :-)
-  - author: Marty Goldberg (USA)
-    date: Tuesday 5th March 2013
-    text: That Amiga section is wrong as well. The ST was not rushed on to the market and was never planned around Amiga technology. It was in fact started \*before\* Jack purchased the Consumer Division. Likewise Atari Inc. was certainly not contracting manufacturing to Amiga, they were simply licensing Amiga''s custom chips. And even then it was for a game console, not a computer. The pending licensing agreement was for an Amiga based game console to be released for the Winter of ''84, which would be allowed to expand with a keyboard expansion in ''85. Then finally in ''86 Atari Inc. would be allowed to release a regular Amiga based computer. Amiga wanted the time to release their own computer on the market - which the pending agreement stipulated. We cover the entire situation in Atari Inc. - Business Is fun (on Amazon) including showing some of the original agreement.
-  - author: Marty Goldberg (USA)
-    date: Tuesday 5th March 2013
-    text: That intro is completely wrong. He did not by Atari Inc., he bought a division of Atari Inc. - the Consumer Division. He in turn folded that in to his own company (TTL) and renamed that to Atari Corporation.
   related:
   - /museum/atari-4160-ste
   - /museum/atari-520-1040-ste