All machines linked to their forum thread (full comment import)

1,289 discussions, 9,527 archived comments; pages no longer carry the comments themselves.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01YDRjtmAiNpo5mK5N3d7QwZ

content/museum/franklin-ace-500.md

@@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ params:
   tabs:
   - photos
   - docs
+  forum_thread: 774
   photos:
   - title: FRONT VIEW
     subtitle: ''
@@ -94,14 +95,6 @@ params:
        source : [www.apple-iigs.info](http://www.apple-iigs.info/)
 
       **... READ THE ONLINE VERSION BY CLICKING BELOW :**
-  comments:
-  - author: Ray McAnally (USA)
-    date: Thursday 17th February 2011
-    text: The ACE 500 was a clone of the Apple //c with some interesting exras. You could use either a Composite input monitor like the Apple //c used or you could use a IBM style CGA monitor. When either monitor was in text mode, you could $ the text color on the screen (green, amber or paper white) The unit shipped in configurations of either 256k or 512k versus the 128k of the Apple //c. This allowed memory resident programs such as Appleworks to be loaded entirely into memory and still provide desk space for large documents as well as switching between documents. The keyboard are is larger with an included 10 key keypad as well as function keys that could be set to perform word processor functions in Appleworks. These functions were available on the Apple by memorizing special key combinations. The Franklin did them automaticly. Having used both machines as well as several others from both Apple and Franklin, I can state that the functionality as well as the build quality of the Franklins
-      were superior to Apple. Apple had some nicer designs, but they could have taken a page from the Franklin play book.
-  - author: MooglyGuy (USA)
-    date: Saturday 30th October 2004
-    text: Regarding the ACE500, I once picked up two or three of them that a computer repair shop was throwing out. They all worked great, and were sturdy machines - I once dropped one several feet and it still worked fine! It's worth noting, however, that the machine isn't exactly like an Apple //c as it's heavier than one, deeper than one. A better gauge would be that it's a couple inches wider and deeper than the Commodore 128. Also, the picture of the connectors is obviously of a version that I did not have - the ones I had had a standard three-pronged AC cable jack where the AC adaptor input is located in the picture.
   oc_id: 793
   source:
     url: https://web.archive.org/web/20230129164849/http://www.old-computers.com/museum/computer.asp?c=793